您的当前位置:首页 > 资讯 > Texas’ new abortion ban punishes abortion patients. 正文
时间:2024-09-23 08:19:23 来源:网络整理 编辑:资讯
Galvanized by the very real possibility that the Supreme Court is poised to overrule Roe v. Wadein t
Galvanized by the very real possibility that the Supreme Court is poised to overrule Roe v. Wadein the coming months, Republican-controlled legislatures around the country are racing to pass extreme new restrictions on abortion. Four states have enacted laws banning all abortions from conception; nearly a dozen more have passed “heartbeat bills” that seek to ban the procedure at six weeks. On Wednesday, Texas joined this bloc when GOP Gov. Greg Abbott signed the state’s own “heartbeat bill,” SB 8, into law. Like the other states that have passed these laws, Texas cannot actually enforce the ban under Roe, which prohibits state officialsfrom banning abortion before viability. But lawmakers believe they have devised a workaround to Roe’s roadblock: Rather than empower state officials to implement the ban, they have granted virtually every private citizen the right to sue anyone who “aids or abets” an abortion after six weeks of pregnancy. The goal is not simply to outlaw abortions, but to terrify and punish patients by bankrupting those who support them.
SB 8’s language is sweeping: It encompasses anyone who “aids or abets the performance or inducement” of an abortion after six weeks, before the vast majority of patients know they’re pregnant. It also applies to any person who merely “intends” to aid or abet such an abortion, regardless of whether they follow through. Almost anybody, including complete strangers, can sue the alleged accomplice in Texas state court. If the plaintiff prevails, the accomplice must pay them a minimum of $10,000 for each abortion “abetted,” plus attorneys’ fees. If a plaintiff sues an alleged accomplice and loses, by contrast, they are notrequired to pay their target’s attorneys’ fees—a recipe for harassing lawsuits. Moreover, the plaintiff can demand litigation in a county of their choice, forcing their target to travel hundreds of miles to defend themselves.
Advertisement Advertisement Advertisement AdvertisementThe breadth of SB 8’s liability is staggering. An insurance company that reimburses the cost of an abortion after six weeks can be held liable. So can the doctors, nurses, and clinic staff who perform the abortion. A patient’s friends, family members, clergy, or rape crisis counselor may be sued if they facilitate access to an abortion banned by SB 8. By driving a patient to the clinic or helping to cover their bill, an acquaintance becomes liable under the law. These individuals can even be sued if they only form an intentto help someone terminate a pregnancy but never act on it. Donors to an abortion fund—including people thousands of miles from Texas with no connection to the patient—may also be sued because of their intent to abet abortion.
Advertisement A patient’s friends, family members, clergy, or rape crisis counselor may be sued if they facilitate access to an abortion.The bill also states that an alleged accomplice may not cite their reliance on “any court decision that has been overruled” as a defense against liability. This rule applies even if the court decision “had not been overruled” at the time of the offense. In other words, SB 8 imposes ex post facto liability, penalizing individuals for conduct that was legal when they engaged in it. And it compels state courts to continue enforcing the law if a lower federal court declares it unconstitutional.
AdvertisementTaken together, these rules would open up a huge number of people to legal sanctions. The measure has one ostensible limitation: It does not allow an individual to sue if he “impregnated the abortion patient through an act of rape, sexual assault, incest,” or another criminal act. But only a small number of rapes are prosecuted, and fewer lead to conviction. What happens if a man impregnates a woman who gets an abortion, then sues under SB 8, and the woman accuses him of rape? The law is ambiguous, but presumably, the alleged rapist’s culpability will be adjudicated as part of the civil proceeding. As a result, the victim will be dragged into the litigation, interrogated, and retraumatized, because her rapist is mad at her for terminating her pregnancy.
Advertisement AdvertisementThis cruelty is a feature, not a bug, of the law. Although SB 8 purports not to punish abortion patients themselves, they are its true targets. It is designed to silence and paralyze a patient’s entire support network, leaving them isolated, afraid, and alone. An individual who decided to terminate their pregnancy cannot turn to friends for help; they cannot ask a family member for assistance; they cannot speak openly with a professional counselor. Again, an individual need only formulate the “intent” to assist an abortion in any way to be held liable in court by total strangers; no patient can have an honest conversation about their decision to terminate without fear that they placed a loved one in danger of debilitated sanctions. SB 8 ensnares abortion patients in a net of legal jeopardy to frighten them out of exercising their rights.
Advertisement Advertisement AdvertisementTexas’ approach may be novel, but its goal is nothing new. While anti-abortion groups disclaim a desire to penalize women, the reality is that it’s impossible to ban abortion without punishing abortion patients. In red states, prosecutors have repeatedly brought criminal charges against women who terminated their own pregnancies in violation of state law. These charges may relate to abortion restrictions, or they may involve creative applications of other criminal laws, like malice murder, abuse of a corpse, or unauthorized practice of medicine. Even with Roe on the books, conservative state officials have proved eager to persecute women who terminate.
This trend will only accelerate as the Supreme Court weakens or overturns the constitutional right to abortion. It seems unlikely (though not impossible) that SB 8 will ever take effect: The bill establishes an untested system that seems destined to collapse into a mess of frivolous suits that would entangle Texas courts in an endless legal nightmare. In addition, as a group of 300 Texas lawyers, including many former judges, pointed out in a letter to the Legislature, the law seems to violate the Texas Constitution, which bars individuals from suing over conduct that did not injure them personally. Whatever the fate of this particular act, however, Texas Republicans’ long-term aim is clear. The state wants to end abortions not just by outlawing the procedure, but also by punishing everyone involved in the process. As SB 8 illustrates, there is no way to do that without punishing patients, too.
Tweet Share Share CommentMalan retires from international cricket2024-09-23 07:43
政策春风惠民 创业就业圆梦2024-09-23 07:36
广东26产品入选新一批全国名特优新农产品!快为你家乡好物投上一票2024-09-23 07:10
四年沉淀 三天准备 只为台上十分钟2024-09-23 07:06
North Korea says it conducted important test to develop multiple warhead missile2024-09-23 07:02
又遇古都,英德红茶在西安的五年2024-09-23 06:49
放宽涉林经营范围 支持农民返乡创业2024-09-23 06:38
龙门乡白伙新村30亩荷塘开种2024-09-23 06:34
Speeding space object triggered a warning. It wasn't an asteroid.2024-09-23 06:33
又遇古都,英德红茶在西安的五年2024-09-23 05:34
Apple Watch bands: 5 favorites to consider as Apple Watch 10 looms2024-09-23 08:13
“潮梅”新式饮品在深圳西雅展受追捧,海外友人如获至宝2024-09-23 07:48
石棉县公安局宣传安全知识 普及安全意识2024-09-23 06:52
回顾茶文化旅游节的精彩瞬间2024-09-23 06:21
DNC 2024 speech: Barack Obama and Michelle Obama have a superpower no other Democrat has.2024-09-23 06:10
广东味香飘两岸!粤字号农产品即将亮相海峡两岸“农订会”2024-09-23 06:09
我市举办中小学生爱国主义演讲选拔赛2024-09-23 06:06
材料不合格 罚;质量不过关 砸2024-09-23 05:51
[Graphic News] Average book price nears 20,000 won2024-09-23 05:42
南农晨读丨经略海洋 筑梦深蓝2024-09-23 05:33